Some people think that only staff who worked in a company for a long time should be promoted to a higher position. What's your opinion?
It is quite irrefutable that promotion is not just a reward that an employee is given for his/her continued good performance but is the proof that it is time to add more responsibilities to an employee’s existing set of responsibilities. This is believed by some people that only the employees who have invested their years working in an organization ought to be raised in rank. I, however, do not agree with this notion as the young workers are more skilled and seeing scarce chances of flourishing would highly discourage them to work for such a company.
At the outset, the young employees who have recently completed their education and training are adroit than the senior staff members who do not make additional effort to learn innovative and modern skills. Unlike them, adult workers are keen on learning recent advancements since the job market has become increasingly competitive lately. In other words, they have mastered hard and soft skills; they can prove to be absolutely productive for the company. Moreover, young workers are comparatively more energetic; therefore, they can work extra for the prosperity of their company. A study conducted in Florida in 2018 showed that employers who preferred young employees had high success rate.
In addition to this, young staff members when would sense limited chances of prospering, would definitely hesitate to go an extra mile in work for the company. This is because such academically exceptional and talented workers would not be allowed to have executive positions; they would not work much diligently and sincerely. Since they have worked hard to attain these higher degrees, seeing their hard work not getting paid off would discourage them. Consequently, the company would not flourish. An article published in a newspaper, The Times, showed how young scientists discovered a technique to measure blood glucose level without pricking a person. Hence, it is obvious how the young talent is useful.
To conclude, though the senior employees are more experienced, the chances of prosperity should be equal to attract young adroit and highly qualified workers to flourish.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2944606414 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88220695519 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562682215743 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5847646852 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.066666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167306315597 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566605259668 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441141057943 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100122075409 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376824055769 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.