Some people think that the only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true fact that with the enormous changes of modern society, the matter which regarding our roads is defined as one of the rising issues in this day and age. Some people think that enacting penalties in a strict way on people driving illegally is the solely way for us to ameliorate the road safe system. I do not totally agree with this viewpoint. I believe that there are some useful measures to be attributable to ensure road safety. This essay will discuss the reasons for my view as below.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that stricter punishments can be somehow effective to improve safety of roads today. Because when traffic participants do not comply with the traffic law, they will be surely penalized under various different forms as a way to greatly contribute to the improvement of road security since it could minimize traffic accidents to some extent. In Vietnam, for example, they can be withdrawn their driving license and pay a fine if commit traffic rules. More seriously, if they cause accident or fatal accident, they will be sentenced and confined in the prison. Someway, it will restrict on happening accidents and upgrading road safety. Those ways are seem to be effective in certain aspects. Nevertheless, it does not mean that giving penalties more strictly is the only way to tackle this problem. For instance, In Vietnam, there are tons of accidents due to the deterioration in quality of road system from contractors which is accountable to build roads. This caused roads to be broken down and holes on the roads stem from this. Therefore, such mishaps shouldn’t be blamed entirely for drivers and other solutions are considered.
In order to address this issue, one depth-basis related to the liability of the government. The government, necessarily, should shoulder the responsibility for the improvement of roads system such as they have more rigid managements and give stingent punishments to people which is liable for constructing roads as some damaged roads is risen from lack of accountability and the negligence of constructors. Furthermore, they should invest money in buying and using cameras on the roads to increase visual drivers especially container or lorry as well. Also, the authority poor money into rebuilding poor or degraded roads to avoid being holes and resulting in falls as well as accidents for people. Besides, So those are of utmost helpful to alleviate the current roads problems.
In conclusion, it has an array of different methods to gain safety roads not only establish stricter punishments on driving offenses but also there are some practical ways to use flexibly proper laws to solve this matter
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a strict way" with adverb for "strict"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...me people think that enacting penalties in a strict way on people driving illegally is the sole...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 684, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'seemed'.
Suggestion: seemed
...d upgrading road safety. Those ways are seem to be effective in certain aspects. Nev...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2242.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 443.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06094808126 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78204776323 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532731376975 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 701.1 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.387681561 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.761904762 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0952380952 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274046848946 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756500458228 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738775794759 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185261027476 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466232781705 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.