In this day and age, an increasing number of contemporaries are paying attention to whether reading story books is more beneficial for children than watching TV or playing e-games or not. Personally, I believe both types of hobbies provide children a range of benefits, and it depends on what benefits each individual wish to achieve and which activities they prefer.
On the one hand, books are instrumental in enhancing children's imagination and development. A kid reading fairy tales with illustration would have to think, fantasize and use their creativeness to comprehend ideas and reasoning, which in turn sharpen their mental skills. Moreover, reading books helps to improve language skills. Spending time on reading books which are not written their mother tongue might provide children golden opportunity to develop a solid linguistic foundation referring its vocabulary or understand meaning of a word in different contexts.
On the other hand, although watching TV and playing video games are often considered to be primarily for entertainment, they play a crucial in improving logical and critical thinking. To be specific, online games often offer players challenges from easy to extremely difficult, requiring them to think with a acute and sharp mind. Therefore, players might draw out reasonable plans to overcome all setbacks of the games. In practice, they would assist children at school, boost up thinking skills and make right decisions. Likewise, watching TV also comes with a fair share of benefits such as cultivating one's imaginativeness regarding its characteristics of programs.
From these above mentioned reasons, the conclusion can be drawn that both types of habits have its own perks. Reading books helps children enhance creativeness while playing video games and watching TV boost their innovations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...difficult, requiring them to think with a acute and sharp mind. Therefore, player...
^
Line 5, column 607, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...r share of benefits such as cultivating ones imaginativeness regarding its characte...
^^^^
Line 5, column 627, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...such as cultivating ones imaginativeness regarding its characteristics of program...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51236749117 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96296021139 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643109540636 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9575350348 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280775828413 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943691868556 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860455105565 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170677599098 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479788305617 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.