Some people think that robots are important for humans future development other think that robots have a negative effect on society
Although it is sometimes thought that robots have an important role in people’s future evolution others, however, believe it may bring more consequences on society. In my opinion, I consider that the time which robots save for humans is the most important benefit for their evolution.
On the one hand, some people think that robots and their contribution to society are significant, and I agree. Firstly, due to the diverse type of robots available on the market people’s life become much easier. For example, parents have extra time to spend with their children building stronger relationships rather than manually wash the dishes. In addition, people can concentrate their attention not only on things they enjoy doing, but also actively participate in community’s development. Secondly, robots can work in extreme conditions where people are helpless. As a result, companies can avoid the risk of getting workers hurt doing heavy manual activities by having robots which are good at doing repetitive work and following instructions.
On the other hand, it is often believed that the effect of robots on society could be harmful. One potential negative outcome is that dedicated workers who invested all their passion could be easily replaced from their job by robots. Moreover, this will lead to an unemployment of many people, that will also have a negative pattern of the economy. Another point to consider is the lack of communication and collaboration. As people, we have emotions, feelings, and we need social interaction to perform well, however, robots do not provide that.
In conclusion, while people may vary in their opinion, I think that humans can greatly benefit from wisely robots use which will save them time and help them maintain a happier life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27622377622 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84213260366 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604895104895 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0024759002 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.785714286 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2142857143 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37492345797 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117218724854 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859643830682 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206973221172 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504621165038 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.