Robots are widely used in people’s life all over the world. Although artificial intelligence may have an adverse impact on the society, I would agree that robots can lead to large improvements in human’s life.
On the one hand, some people are strong advocates of developing robots because intelligent robots could accomplish the impossible tasks which are beneficial to human being’s future development. The robots can endure the hostile environment of any places no matter where in the space. They can be used to overcome the limitations that humans have. For example, Project Apollo, regarded as the milestone in landing the humans in the moon, may be easily completed by robots without any deaths or huge funding. Considering the speed of evolution, space exploration finally can help human find habitable planets in the future.
On the other hand, robots can replace human labor. The machines have significantly improved efficiency and productivity compared to human beings. For example, they can reduce the amount of manual work. Industrial robots can produce products in the factories such as assembling the cars. They can work at places 24/7 without any salary and food, plus they don’t get bored. In the long term, companies can reduce the cost by using robots. Considering the speed of evolutions, artificial intelligence would finally control human beings and colonize the earth.
In my view, it is undeniable that robots already become one part of our life. The development of robots can also lead to technological innovations in the future. These innovations can largely improve the technology in many aspects, such as ocean explosions. Robots can help humans to solve more unknown problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, may, so, for example, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.336996337 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8517418661 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5108986371 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.9444444444 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1666666667 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38888888889 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251703878402 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898342036061 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684949303955 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167877680824 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464599493269 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.1 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.