Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The question of whether to reward students who possess outstanding academic performance or those with improved grades remains a source of controversy in recent times. The following essay will discreetly analyze both views and then give my own opinion on the matter.
On the one hand, there are several reasons supporting the advocates of rewarding excellent students. First and foremost, this paves the way for competition among excellent students. Instead of being satisfied with the results, they would work more industriously on their assignments and test scores to compete with their peers to achieve the prizes. Secondly, rewards make it no longer challenging to seek out talented students. Offering rewards in every examination would draw the attention and participation of more students; hence, more outstanding factors can be identified based on the test results. This, undoubtedly, gives rise to further academic development as the authorities would pay special attention to those students. and allocate resources to nurturing their abilities.
On the other hand, despite the aforementioned points, I would argue that offering prizes to those making strides in their learning should be high on the school agenda. To commence with, this provides equivalent chances for students at all levels. Bias in favor of top students does not exist anymore and every student can receive fair treatment as long as they show enhancement in academic performances. Additionally, the policy can be the driving force for children’s learning spirits. When the opportunities are divided adequately for all, they are no longer under the pressure of competing with peers to get high scores for rewards. Instead, a sense of enjoyment emerges among students, boosting their overall understanding and efficiency in every lesson.
In short, although rewarding excellent students may do wonders to a certain extent, it still seems that both the educational system and students can reap more benefits from the policy of giving prizes for improving ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether to reward students who possess outstand...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 398, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seeking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: seeking
..., rewards make it no longer challenging to seek out talented students. Offering rewards...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 733, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...ay special attention to those students. and allocate resources to nurturing their a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48253968254 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88409509815 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615873015873 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.431094803 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.9375 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219584128192 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628201870329 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062785413071 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149358882689 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590433876043 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.