The line chart shows the rate of oil consumption in a small country from 1950 to 2010. The table shows the number of people employed in the oil industry of that country and the rate of unemployment around the country at the same time
The given line chart gives information on the yearly consumption level of oil (in millions of barrels) in a small nation over a course of 60 years (1950-2010), and the remaining graph illustrates the percentage of employment in the oil patch as well as that of unemployment nationwide in the meantime.
Overall, there is no correlation between the annual rate of petroleum usage and the proportion of oil-related jobs and unemployment throughout the given timeframe; while the former underwent a period of substantial growth in million barrels, the latter witnessed a stark contrast in two surveyed categories: a surge for occupations supported by oil industry but a plummet for national unemployment rate.
From the onset, the oil consumption registered 20 million barrels in 1950, followed by a relative plateau around this rate until the 1970s. To end the period, there was a twofold escalation in the next 30 years before the usage rate continually increased with recorded data of 50 million barrels, a rise of 10 million generated.
Meanwhile, the employment rate in oil sector showed an identical performance to the internal unemployment one during the starting decade, with statistics ranging around 1000 and 4.0 respectively. After that, a clear contrast was manifested. While a progressive rise of 400-800 could be seen concerning the former, the latter finished the course with a gradual decline from 1980 to 2010, ultimately standing at 1.6%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 226, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...rwent a period of substantial growth in million barrels, the latter witnessed a stark c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, well, while, as well as, as well as that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28017241379 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05690372347 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612068965517 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.430009578 43.030603864 247% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 175.0 112.824112599 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1428571429 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285097406166 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1176454484 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791987788587 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162398970519 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254131100022 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.2329268293 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 61.2550243902 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.06136585366 127% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 40.7170731707 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.5 11.4329268293 258% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 30.0 11.0658536585 271% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.