A large number of parents and students think that current college entrance examination should be abolished together. What do you think?
In recent years, there is a fierce controversy concerning the issue of whether a principle of rescinding tertiary entrance examination should be done away with or not. While admission tests to a four-year college program is of paramount importance in some respects, the shortcomings of this policy are more significant.
There are many benefits of proposing uniform college entrance exam. To begin with, it helps to classify students’ levels. Taking the grueling tests is a good chance to pick out those who have outstandingly academic performance. Hence, they can be accepted into top-tier schools, where there is better access to challenging learning resources and exposure to peers at the same levels. On the contrary, groups of student getting low entry score will be categorized into lower-ranking academes. Additionally, examination broadens students’ horizon in terms of expertise. Since college entrance exams are standardized to eveluate students for admission purposes, the main focus of these is likely a wide range of knowledge in all fields rather than a specific one. Students hereby have to go over on all subjects and even carry out research to cultivate their mind ready for the upcomming exam.
However, the drawbacks of conducting examinatiom for post-secondary education are greater, far outweighing the advantages. First and foremost, it may trigger negativity in scores. The most typical example recently is Ha Giang, where several examiners are accused of giving unfair grades as a result of bribery. Consequently, the dreams to enrol for high-ranking universities of other students are directly stolen. Secondly, students are put under much test anxiety due to punishingly difficult exams. It is a proven fact that those involving in heavy workloads tend to suffer from complete exhaution, leading to various physical well-being problems. Furthermore, pressure coming from parents may cause an improper competitiveness between their offsprings and peers.
All things considered, the abolition of tertiary entrance examination is vitally chief in a sense that in not only brings about an innovative breakthrough in the college recruitment but also improves students’ life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 663, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...te students for admission purposes, the main focus of these is likely a wide range of know...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58805970149 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09663763212 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674626865672 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9763193852 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6111111111 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17850020702 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483614326367 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370783668485 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103612762312 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02391995294 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.