The ablilities of children vary from person to person. Some people believe that it's better to arrange pupils in their schools according to their academic performance, while some other people debate that children who study together should have diversities of abilities. In my view, I perceive it's more benificial for those pupils to study with peers with mixed abilities.
Some people think only those academically-strong pupils should study in the same environment because it can help these students make more progress in futher study. It is undoubtly that children can be easily affected by environment, especially for studying. Thus, if pupils with good academic performance study together, they tend to complete with each other so that have more enthusiasm for studying. Furthermore, courses in a academically-strong class are of more efficiency because teathers do not need to worry much about students' ability of absorbing new knowledge and slow down the pace.
Some other people percieve that students are able to corporate as a team when they have different abilities. When people get along more with peers that have different abilities, they can learn how to find out others' strength and capacity. For instance, if students in the class have different skills and strength, they will not focus purely on competing. Instead, pupils can think more about what others good at and how to arrange each of them in group assignments. Thus, students are more likely to be good at teamwork and this is also essential to their future work or study.
In my view, pupils can learn more diversified abilities from others by arranging these distinguished students together. A children's development doesn't need good grade only. In contrast, it is also significant to cultivate a wide range of caopacity. The proper way to obtaining these is to learn from peers. With proper guidence, every pupil is able to study others' strenghs, which can contribute to their future success. In comparison, if pupils are grouped according to academic performances, what they focus on is mainly studying, which is bad to their growth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...m for studying. Furthermore, courses in a academically-strong class are of more e...
^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...dents together. A childrens development doesnt need good grade only. In contrast, it i...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in contrast, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21114369501 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86624751631 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507331378299 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6653645635 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7222222222 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9444444444 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377045564034 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113919573056 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113274579544 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251704588987 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930829595082 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.