Whether online studying is more valid is still questionable in tody's world. Some people believe that it's crucial for children to study on internet while some other people argue that studying in schools is more effective. In my view, traditional way of studying is the priority.
Some people think students' problem-solving ability can be improved by studying online. When encountering some questions, children need to search for documents and data in the website. This means they are gradually able to find valid ones among enourmous information and think independently about how the solutions are generated. For example, children need to find out how the results are produced when they serching for the answers of mathematical problems. In these cases they are totolly envolved in study and all of the aknowledge should only be obtained though exploring and selecting massive information. Consequently, children will grow the habit of thinking critically and can also tackle things by their own efforts.
However, some people argue that traditional education is able to impart students proper knowledge to help them study better. It's undoubtly that the majority of the teaching contents in class are realistic and right because the curriculum is strictly selected. This means students are less likely to take the risk of wasting time on wrong information and the time and efforts they have spent continuesly contributes to their progress. In contrast, half of the information on internet is unproper and it would also be time-consuming for students, especially children to figure out the valid document.
In my view, teachers and schools are skilled in making students concerntrate and be intersted on study. Teachers are able to find out some effective way that can make it easier for students to absorb knowledge. That's whay students are more likely to be opptimistic to studying with teachers' proper teaching methods and encouragement. For example, English teachers can compile vocabularies in story telling to make it more vivid and impressive. Consequently, students are more likely to accept the knowledge and be confident on studying. In the contrast, searching online need students to find their own way and it's hard for them to perseve because their enthusiasm can be rapidly eroded.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether online studying is more valid is still ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... they are totolly envolved in study and all of the aknowledge should only be obtained thou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...asier for students to absorb knowledge. Thats whay students are more likely to be opp...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 407, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'making'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'tell' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: making
...n compile vocabularies in story telling to make it more vivid and impressive. Consequen...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, so, still, thus, while, for example, in contrast, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32417582418 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88284613456 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489010989011 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1860344514 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1578947368 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94736842105 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223801138175 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730928334906 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577930340772 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136474404335 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394970693862 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.