Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
It is often argued that schools should have learners with different abilities to be educated together. In my opinion, however, I strongly believe that students should be selected by teachers according to their own abilities.
On the one hand, classes including different abilities of students can exert positive impacts for a variety of reasons. The primary cause would be that mixed ability classes encourage everyone to achieve their potential. The second reason is that when streaming, students from wealthier families tend to be better prepared but those from poorer families may receive less support from parents.
On the other hand, streaming would be a much better choice in schools. Firstly, teachers can work at the right speed for their students and plan more suitable lessons for them. Knowing their pupils’ weakness and strengths, they can change their methodologies so as for students to achieve fruitful results at the same pace because there are not major disparities in ability within the stream. Secondly, selecting students according to their abilities shape their confidence since no one is made to feel inferior or stupid in comparison with other peers. In fact, such types of classes offer scholastic as well as friendly competitiveness which is, in itself, motivational. Therefore, high-level groups may make faster progress and lower level groups can benefit from a slower pace.
In conclusion, even though many people reckon that every student should be mixed together on one classroom, I strongly believe that streaming should be applied at every school worldwide.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as for, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70417750897 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3548331181 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8333333333 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301870761488 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112827311315 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947687433761 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203392714384 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114115198792 0.056905535591 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.