Some people think that scientists expirementing with animals in a labaratory is the only way we can guarantee new products will be safe for human use
Animal beings play a vital role in nature. If animals are not existed, human beings can not control and live in nature without doubt. Some people think than we can safe products for human use by only experimenting animals in a laboratory whereas others hold opposite idea. Personally, I have a balanced opinion on this issue and will give several arguments in detail.
On the one hand, most individuals maintain that if producers check their product on animals, less people will suffer from damage of no quality goods. For instance, any drug are tested on rat or ape several times and sold in pharmacy. Consequently, experimenting product before consuming lead to decreasing of negative effects of goods.What is more, most people can trust manufactures, the reason is they know that the output of any company are tested on animals. For example, when someone goes to the shopping mall, it is written on the product “It is safe and checked as well as conditions when occurs negative effect” Psychologically it leads to buy anything without hesitation about their safeness.
On the other hand, because of globalization the population of animal beings declined more and more. Scientists just kill or give poison them on purpose of some experiment. It affects to our mother nature and one day environment also suicide us for our damage to nature Furthermore, animals are also slave of God and people have no right kill or test them, it is said In Koran or In Bible that people can kill some animals only for consuming. Therefore, people try to detoriate the death of animals and save them for our nature.
In conclusion, government should keep balance on this issue by some legislation or regulation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...oducers check their product on animals, less people will suffer from damage of no qu...
^^^^
Line 2, column 335, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: What
...decreasing of negative effects of goods.What is more, most people can trust manufact...
^^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ur damage to nature Furthermore, animals are also slave of God and people have no...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98951048951 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77627882139 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583916083916 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.2549878202 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.769230769 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6923076923 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337496224354 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109505509955 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977410842325 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184630318085 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130750603437 0.056905535591 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.