Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
These days, there are individuals who argue that the nature of competition should be promoted in early childhood while there are some who advocate nurturing a more cooperative mindset in order to grow up as a well-rounded person. This essay will be providing both perspectives, followed by my own.
Without a doubt, people are primarily competitive creatures that consequence clashes between tribes and the World Wars. Hence, it is advisable to encourage a characteristic of being competitive only if it is a healthy approach, which is competing with one's own self. By practicing youngsters to assume 'today 'me' is better than that of yesterday', the child will gradually improve self-awareness in detecting the weaknesses and strengthening the abilities to become a more efficient person. Healthy competition is certainly beneficial which also prohibits the tendency to turn into hatred or jealousy to the other rivals. For instance, the young athletes who review both tape records of their own performance and their counterparts are likely to do better performance in the coming attempts than those who only look for other people's weaknesses and try to take advantage of them. Therefore, competitiveness can actually bring a positive impact to the children if the message is delivered correctly since the concept is notorious for its disadvantages.
On the other hand, if the shadow side of human nature is competitiveness, the bright side would be the cooperative mindset. The success of the contemporary days is the result of the long-term cooperation among the stakeholders. To cite an example, more people got vaccinated for the Covid 19 due to the collaborative approach of developed countries that had invented multiple vaccines for the disease. Witnessing how much cooperation brings a great impact globally, it is crucial for young individuals to develop a mindset of cooperation.
To conclude, it is advisable that both arguments are equally important for the development of the children in different ways, keeping in mind that the first approach should be conducted in a more cautious way.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, hence, if, look, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33033033033 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1845908837 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588588588589 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.4072219924 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.538461538 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234986307541 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071643603852 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468472112015 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136481542162 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059340054531 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.