Some people think that shool should select students acording to their academic abilities. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend?
There is no doubt that schools have played an important role in the societies' education for a long time. While some believe that school should categorize students based on their academic performances, others do not. However, it is a fact that this trend would bring not only certain benefits but also some unavoidable drawbacks.
On the one hand, it is evident that this new educational approach would create several advantages. Firstly, students who have the similar intellectual background will have the corresponding pace of advancement in study skills; therefore, mentors and professors will have no difficulty in evaluating students' abilities. They can then conduct suitable lectures due to the students' needs and capacities. Better individual attention is another plus point of this trend. It goes without saying that higher standard students can pick up the lessons within a shorter time compared to other students. As a result, teachers would enhance these students' learning process efficiently and encourage them to keep moving forward.
On the other hand, there are some obvious downside that would arise from this kind of ability grouping instruction. It is undeniable that a unique talent is often a randomly discovered one. A mixed-ability class will give the tutors chances to find out the hidden talented scholars. Moreover, working in a diverse intellectual environment can facilitate social interactions among students. It promotes greater contact, support, self-confidence and cooperative skills. Last but not least, peer pressure is also a major minus point of this method. Lower-level students definitely find it embarrassing and exhausting to catch up with the higher-level students. Consequently, they will be discouraged and have worse learning outcomes.
In conclusion, this controversial development causes both pros and cons. Some positive impact on students' selection according to academic abilities such as better teaching quality are irrefutable. Meanwhile, the possibility of missing talents and massive stress from mates are two weaknesses that should be taken into account.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There is no doubt that schools have play...
^^
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'societies'' or 'society's'?
Suggestion: societies'; society's
...ls have played an important role in the societies education for a long time. While some b...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut also some unavoidable drawbacks. On the one hand, it is evident that this...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ourage them to keep moving forward. On the other hand, there are some obviou...
^^
Line 6, column 45, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'downsides'?
Suggestion: downsides
... the other hand, there are some obvious downside that would arise from this kind of abil...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and have worse learning outcomes. In conclusion, this controversial develo...
^^
Line 8, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... pros and cons. Some positive impact on students selection according to academic abiliti...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66352201258 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01955082685 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657232704403 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2178792219 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.05 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218861986959 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056834677301 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608539226396 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137007315124 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428779180583 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.