Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The use of social networking sites has indeed gained in popularity over the past few decades. Even though many individuals believe that these sites are harmful to people and society, I partially agree.
There are a number of reasons why social networking sites could be fraught with many pitfalls. Profiles on social media could easily be faked, which could be used for criminal purposes, posing as serious threats to coerced individuals. For example, on some dating apps, victims could fall prey to sexual predators through fake profiles, resulting in sexual abuse victims. Furthermore, many people spend entire days on social networking sites, which leads to addiction. As a result, the quality of their education and employment is greatly diminished, and they are gradually lagging behind in today's society.
On the other hand, social media sites could have many beneficial impacts. Social networking media can prove to be a good opportunity to make money. For example, This can be done by selling clothes, blogging, affiliate marketing, and many others, all of which result in a steady source of income. Besides, social networking platforms may also assist people in enhancing their life skills and broaden their knowledge. For instance, there are numerous websites on social media that teach foreign languages, cook, repair, converse, psychology, and sports, allowing users to consult and self-study without attending classes.
In conclusion, social networking services offer both upsides and downsides. It will become an extremely valuable tool in our life if people know how to use it properly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42629482072 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63786542392 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.653386454183 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1530908445 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2857142857 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185066933884 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715257909265 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487616342534 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122277965533 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242468476529 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.