Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is so easy to realize that traffic accidents are very high every year. To decrease traffic accidents some people think that stric punishments for driving are the key, others believe that another solution would be more effective. In my opinion, both view can used together to control traffic accidents.
There are various reasons why they believe strict punishments are the key for traffic accidents. First cause, strict punishments which make citizens afraid lead to traffic accidents decrease steadily. Government have strict punishments in the economy is one way make they don't violate traffic laws. Next, penalties make they more aware while take part in traffic. As a result, all of us hope no more traffic accidents so that they must follow the rules more carefully.
On the other hand, i admit that traffic accidents can promote by other measures. Firstly, it is vitally important to educate aware to decrease traffic accidents. Something which is beared in mind always better, alway remember follow the rules carefully help drives avoid traffic accidents. Secondly, traffic accidents are not all fault of drivers, it can due to bad road. Government should attention on reduce road accidents by invest more in better transport.
In conclusion, traffic accidents are alway bad problem. I believe that traffic accidents will be declined.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 212, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...accidents decrease steadily. Government have strict punishments in the economy is on...
^^^^
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nts in the economy is one way make they dont violate traffic laws. Next, penalties m...
^^^^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...les more carefully. On the other hand, i admit that traffic accidents can promot...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 215.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26976744186 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56942963159 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 176.041082164 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6729992481 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.5333333333 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3333333333 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293196892163 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110352382431 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858888192289 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192880490476 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900200824313 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.