Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students how to judge right and wrong and how to behave well. Some say that teachers should only teach students about academic subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion
In the threshold of of the new era, a burgeoning number of people are concerned about teachers-related problems. Many people have mixed opinions with regard to whether it is a good idea for teachers to have a responsibility to teach students the distinction between right or wrong or to only teach academic subjects. While some of those advocate the later, my view is that althought there exists several certain limitation, teachers should give students needed counsel in terms of non-academic skills rather than only teaching available subjects in curriculum.
It is irrefutable is that teachers’ advice is indeed beneficial for students. In this regard, teachers completely have more experience regarding social problems than students, especially the morals as well as good qualities, which is entirely essential for students’ career path in the long run. By gaining non-academic knowledge, students are able to be aware of what is right or wrong things obviously,enabling them to rehabilitate social skills and orient their paticular views for themselves. For instance, thanks to teachers’ advice in regard to morals, violent and criminal behaviours have considerable declined in schools. Accordingly, teaching non-academic things has a positive effect on students.
Nevertheless, that is not to say that teachers have to be responsible for teaching students the different between right and wrong because of several restrictions. Firstly, cirriculums are created to only accommodate and guarantee students’ requirement in terms of academic subjects. In other words, the quantity of academic knowledge which need to be offerd to students is properly huge while time in schools is limited. Furthermore, the responsibility to teach students non-academic skills must be placed on their parents. The mainly reasons is that parents are those who foster their offsprings directly in home,leading to establishment of fundamental conscious regarading morals effectively and efficiently.
Inconclusion, for reasons I have mentioned above, I suppose that teachers should give advice for their students when necessary in shools and parents are those who should be responsible for help their children to make the right choices.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
In the threshold of of the new era, a burgeoning number of peo...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...give students needed counsel in terms of non-academic skills rather than only tea...
^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gaining non-academic knowledge, students are able to be aware of what is right or...
^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , enabling
... what is right or wrong things obviously,enabling them to rehabilitate social skills and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reated to only accommodate and guarantee students' requirement in terms of a...
^^
Line 5, column 620, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , leading
...foster their offsprings directly in home,leading to establishment of fundamental conscio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir children to make the right choices.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, while, for instance, i suppose, as well as, in other words, in regard to, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71343283582 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31071557266 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537313432836 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6467318888 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.714285714 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0714285714 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423210736337 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146867715806 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091375707683 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27269094804 0.151304729494 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852023998436 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.