There has been a heated debate on the features that instructors should focus on while teaching children at school. There is a common belief that showing the ropes of what is true false is in trachers' charge whereas others claim students should merely learn academic qualifications. In this essay, I will explore both views and following this draw some conclusions.
On the one hand, it is often advocated that teachers should be instucted to educate adolscents moral ans immoral values. That is to say, such kind of standardised classes can enable us to preserve values of a community from one generation to the next making its people unique. One point is that in Japan and Sounth Korea young people are trained to shape a set of principles which contributes to uphold particular traditions of a country in the long run. In addition, this is the case when the crime rate in a society decreases thanks to high principles of citizens.
On the other hand, most people figure out that it is responsibility of parents, instead of educators, to teach their offsprings how to behave well from early ages. Owing to the limited time at school, they should concentrate all their efforts on academic subjects on the syllabus. This is because, they are often obsessed with improving academic standards which is crucial in students' foreseeable future career.
In conclusion, after analysing both aspects of the argument, it appears to me that instructing youngsters how to conform and differentiate between right and wrong is the duty of both parents and teachers, as they play an integral role in establishing a child's skills, defining strengths and weaknesses
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their offsprings how to behave well from early ages. Owing to the limited time at...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05109489051 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81807603873 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63503649635 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5028105907 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.818181818 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258882499468 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751133805999 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436859574274 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127886043659 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462024525993 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.