Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
With the proliferation of contemporary lifestyles comes a wide range of the socio-economic dilemmas. Indeed, the question of whether making noise should be limited by some strict laws remains a source of controversy. Although noise is an unavoidable consequence of the industrialization and modernization process, I would argue that reducing noise offers more advantages to the society.
On the one hand, there is several reasons why noise play a crucial in the modern society. Firstly, heavy industries often generates a large amount of noises during production process because there is numerous of huge machines, which take part in this to manufacture goods for demanding of market. Secondly, the individual activities, which are the usage of private vehicles and are the entertainment events, have caused an enormous amount of noise. Therefore, as a result of these aforementioned reasons, noise is an inevitable result of economic development and recreational activities.
On the other hand, I believe that in spite of various benefits of making noise, imposing some laws on making noise could result in more favorable outcomes, the most obvious of which are human’s health promotion and a reduction in noise pollution. With regard to the former, suffering from noise in a long term may cause harmful impacts to human’s health. A good illustration for this is that the citizens living nearby industrial zones suffer from sleep deprivation at night, which leads to a deterioration in their mental and physical health. Furthermore, white-collar worker cannot concentrate on their task because the work environment is polluted by the noise of traffic on the street.
In conclusion, making noise is beneficial to some extents, it seem to me that the government should enact a few essential measures to control noise, thereby raise the life quality of citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
With the proliferation of contemporary l...
^^^^
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lifestyles'' or 'lifestyle's'?
Suggestion: lifestyles'; lifestyle's
... With the proliferation of contemporary lifestyles comes a wide range of the socio-economi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...of the socio-economic dilemmas. Indeed, the question of whether making noise should be limited by some ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers more advantages to the society. On the one hand, there is several reason...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lopment and recreational activities. On the other hand, I believe that in spi...
^^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...noise is beneficial to some extents, it seem to me that the government should enact ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result, in spite of, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43686006826 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14317238914 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607508532423 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2823460464 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.75 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0833333333 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16977451486 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599795003339 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693716304286 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11158017281 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441130732844 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.