Some people think that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people think that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree?

In this day and age, humans are more likely to take care of wild animals and birds by means of giving too much attention and resources. I, personally, concur with this mindet due to the valuable and importance of wildlife.

To begin with, animals in general and wild animals in particular play a pivotal role in people society. First, they contribute to the huge biodiversity with a wide range of species which provide numerous materials for scientists in the way to protect endangerd animals by breeding in laboratory. In addition, the myriad of wild animals are able to do a favor for human ecosystem which can sustain the balace in planet. Should animals vanish, ecosystem and people cannot find any resourses to maintain their lives.

Admittedly, a large number of wild animals are on the brink of extinction so governments and individuals should take action to protect them. These days, the figure of disappeared animals documented soar astonishingly. Humans realize this problem and they raise awareness to preserve the remaining wild animals and birds by keep some of them in the zoo and give them the special carings or find some new methods to protect them in nature. Take the red bears, an rare animal in Vietnam, they are kept in the National Park and fed them with the specialize food.

To sum up, from my perspective, protecting wild animals is a must action because of their significant functions, therefore,human should pay attention to these animals, especially rare animals by devoting resources and habitants to retain human lives,

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...to maintain their lives. Admittedly, a large number of wild animals are on the brink of extinc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ect them in nature. Take the red bears, an rare animal in Vietnam, they are kept i...
^^
Line 5, column 539, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... in the National Park and fed them with the specialize food. To sum up, from my perspectiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , human
...f their significant functions, therefore,human should pay attention to these animals, ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, in addition, in general, in particular, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0503875969 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75835315155 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577519379845 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0929716948 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.454545455 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259092510551 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935243508942 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635545228772 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150431868409 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186874780871 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.