Some people think that the use of animal for experimentation is cruel. Other think it is good for the development of science. Discuss the two sides and give your opinion.

In the last decades, adopting creatures for investigations has soared in astounding ways. While some folks argue that the application of beasts in any types of analyses is extremely inhumane, i believe that the research is wholly worthy for the advancement of science. This essay will support my opinion with relevant examples.

On the one hand, critics insist that it is an evil act to employ mammals for probes because the testing protocols generally remain enormously harrowing, where the brutes are normally restrained physically for long periods and inflicted deep wounds in order to observe ...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.

Votes
Average: 9.6 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ypes of analyses is extremely inhumane, i believe that the research is wholly wor...
^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...riods and inflicted deep wounds in order to observe the inflammatory changes. Not...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71703296703 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02492738194 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.697802197802 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0640766394 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.733333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2666666667 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201846896862 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596997057551 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385327883994 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125924037112 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178326182431 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.25 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 78.4519038076 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Next, another key aspects of examinations are that
Next, another key aspect of examinations is that
Next, other key aspects of examinations are that

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.5 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 364 350
No. of Characters: 2035 1500
No. of Different Words: 249 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.368 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.591 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.964 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 170 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 134 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 91 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 66 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.267 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.896 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.533 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.272 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.492 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.006 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5