Some people think that the world should have one government rather than the national government. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
There has been a noticeable debate about whether our world should have a single united government. While one united government can benefit our population to a certain extent, I would argue that its disadvantages do outweigh the advantages.
On the one hand, one government on our planet has some undoubted benefits to the whole community. To begin with, unifying under a global government can facilitate cross-national traveling as tourists may not have to acquire cumbersome travel documents. It is much easier to travel to other exotic areas since tourists no longer have to use passports or approval letters on arrival. This can possibly reduce time-consuming in the lounge area in the airports. Additionally, one world-state could encourage member countries to contribute collectively to solve common problems. For example, there are many international crimes but due to the complex condition among countries and the cumbersome documents when opening an inquiry in other foreign countries, lots of crimes are still free in the community. Then if a global state is created, police can catch the offenders easier.
On the other hand, these advantages are eclipsed by the disadvantages when it comes to having a global government. First, there may be a loss of individual cultural identities because of homogenization, especially relating to language. As the integration among different nations increases, people tend to keep up with the major trend as well as learn the major language, Consequently, their own religions and traditions could be destroyed and disappeared. Second, a world federation can lead to some serious conflicts in certain parts of the population. Smaller or poorer nations may feel they are not fairly represented in a world authority. When gathering into one authority, many dominant countries will take the higher position and other poorer ones must follow their decision. The United States and China are prime examples. They can monopolize in most of the international financial ranks so their speech in some global meeting can change the whole world.
In conclusion, although a world state may have some benefits, it seems to me that this action still poses lots of significant disadvantages that governments should take into great consideration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 387, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...ts or approval letters on arrival. This can possibly reduce time-consuming in the lounge are...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, still, then, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1923.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38655462185 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06176431828 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593837535014 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3034595347 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.833333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290025998054 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078536011644 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718488994886 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186129725444 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414592806769 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.