Some people think young people are much more influenced by friends than parents or teachers? Do you agree or disagree?
Imitation is a modern phenomena so that is why a majority of youngsters have often attract on their age mates to see their high standards and branded personalities and not progenitors or mentors. However, I strongly accord with the perception because young ones are sharing similar age periods, spending lots of time together, their modern looks, higher status as well as same ideas and thinking.
The main factor to support this notion is that young people are sharing same age groups with their peers so that is the reason due to variations in their harmonies which responsible to influence youngsters on their friends. On the other hand, high standards and latest personalities of their age mates are playing crucial role to imitate youngsters by friends as compared with parents or educators. For example, in school , if anyone their buddy is purchasing branded clothes,shoes or I-phone than their other group friends also influenced on them and put pressures on their guardians to buy those things for them which detrimentally affects their monthly family budgets. Apart from this, some mothers and fathers are suffering from poorness and not able to get those goods for their offsprings due to these it create negative effects on both’s relations.
The another fact is that a vast amount of young people expanding a huge proportion of times together with their peers in educational centres, tuition classes, sport grounds and etcetera. In addition to this, so that is the reason they all have similar views and ideas which allows them to attract on each others. In other words, some friends are helpful for young ones in various manners and provide sufficient solutions for their complications in better ways. For instance, if a student is this week in their studies than sometimes their friend circle assist them in their studies to do better. In contrast, the concerning area about this prospective is that bed companies of young people’s friends dramatically involved them into inhumanity activities, consuming drugs, robbery and so many criminal activities which spoils their life. Moving further, it is generally said that a good company makes a people good but bed company destroy their all future.
In conclusion, although, attraction on peers among youngsters is a beneficial for them but at some extent. Furthermore, bed groups of friends are harmful for their upcoming periods which leads to criminal world.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'attracted'.
Suggestion: attracted
...why a majority of youngsters have often attract on their age mates to see their high st...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nts or educators. For example, in school , if anyone their buddy is purchasing bra...
^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , shoes
...heir buddy is purchasing branded clothes,shoes or I-phone than their other group frien...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 812, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creates'?
Suggestion: creates
...ds for their offsprings due to these it create negative effects on both's relatio...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, well, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22900763359 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7249582491 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549618320611 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.6156485442 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.785714286 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0714285714 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3571428571 7.06120827912 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129138106863 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052180659221 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323117061352 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771986375354 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493030562363 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'attracted'.
Suggestion: attracted
...why a majority of youngsters have often attract on their age mates to see their high st...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nts or educators. For example, in school , if anyone their buddy is purchasing bra...
^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , shoes
...heir buddy is purchasing branded clothes,shoes or I-phone than their other group frien...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 812, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creates'?
Suggestion: creates
...ds for their offsprings due to these it create negative effects on both's relatio...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, well, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22900763359 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7249582491 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549618320611 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.6156485442 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.785714286 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0714285714 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3571428571 7.06120827912 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129138106863 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052180659221 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323117061352 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771986375354 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493030562363 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.