It is often argued that youth should have an open choice of their future employment opportunities, whilst others believe that the choice of future occupation should be based on real-life and be practical. In this essay, both points of view will be examined and will stay that real insight and practical preference for future jobs would benefit adolescents’ sustainable future.
It is clear that having a free choice of future profession may contribute to achieving job satisfaction and hence, finding personal fulfilment. In other words, work chosen from the heart may give them insight into what they really like to do and pursue a career more meticulously. It would mean that young people probably could not only be significantly motivated but also be inspired by an aspiration for desired job opportunities. However, adolescents’ expectations tend to end in failure when it comes to making a decision. This is because in general, young people are more influenced by others opinions. Therefore, their own free decision appears to might be based on some fad interests or any bizarre work such as blogging and gaming, rather than the long-term perspective of traditional pursuits.
Nevertheless, some people hold the view that the choice of foreseeable future ought to be pragmatic. This is important because the young generation may consider the pros and cons related possible job prospects and gain the necessary knowledge. This is not only would contribute to avoiding lack of money giving preference to a lucrative job but also would help them surpass other candidates when it comes to being hired. For instance, being awareness of pluses and minuses of the profession such as a veterinarian, friend of mine has enrolled to study anatomy at school and stood out from other opposite numbers. Moreover, despite the fact that previously made choice might be changed dramatically, having education and practical conception of the world tends to open a wide range of job opportunities.
In conclusion, although people may vary in their opinions whether young people ought to be free in their choice of career, personally, I think that the decision of future vocation has to be more practical. This is beneficial since it may help to weigh up all benefits and drawbacks of future career opportunity and gain vital knowledge from scratch.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, as to, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in general, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18205804749 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92407336177 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548812664908 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.9207742301 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.933333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2666666667 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360574753602 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11390742165 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961256491158 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221987430837 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404079117724 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.