Some people want government to spend money on life on other planets. However, others think it is a waste of public money when the earth already has so many problems. Discuss both views and give you own opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people want government to spend money on life on other planets. However, others think it is a waste of public money when the earth already has so many problems. Discuss both views and give you own opinion.

People have differing views with regard to the areas where the public money should be invested in. Some people argue the government should spend money on searching alien lives on other planets so that human beings may find alternative planets to live in the future. Others, however, oppose this view and believe there are more important concerns on Earth waiting to be addressed.

Curiosity and current resource depletion motivate people to explore other planets. People have been wondering if we are the only intelligent creatures in the universe. Out of curiosity, many programmes such as Mars missions have been launched in order to find life on other planets. In addition, energy source shortages urge people to find an alternative place to live in the future. Due to the significant growth of vehicle numbers, today’s demand for fuel and petrol has increased on an unprecedented scale. Many people believe that seeking for a planet which is suitable for human beings to live is a solution for further development for future generations. Spending money on searching for alien lives could satisfy people themselves and tackle the resource issues.

However, the opponents believe that there are other more important concerns, such as health problems and poverty need to be addressed. Globally, many people are suffering from some incurable diseases, including diabetes and cancers. If the government can use this money for developing new medicines to tackle these diseases, it can free many people from suffering. Additionally, there are many people in the third world countries still living below the poverty line. They are facing food and water shortages. By spending the public money on providing a safety net to those in need, more people can be saved from extreme hunger and poverty.

In conclusion, alien life exploration may satisfy people’s curiosity and tackle resource problems, and human beings’ life could be improved greatly if the money is spent on addressing the issues mentioned above. I believe the government should give the priorities to solve the problems that people are facing on Earth.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, still, third, in addition, in conclusion, such as, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30383480826 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68813311444 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52802359882 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0966788304 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8888888889 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277813426221 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875656266201 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521183096984 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179986336558 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357618787865 0.056905535591 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.