Some people want the government to spend money looking for other life on other planets, but others think it is a waste of public money, because there are many problems need to be solved on the earth.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about the worthiness of investing space discovery for outer space creatures as opposed to solving the existing issues on the earth. While exploring unknown things have always promoted the progress of mankind, the actual problems that human confronted with is more critical.
To begin with, space exploration, as a part of scientific discovery, is important and necessary for the progress of science. However, searching for outer space creatures is too early up to now. Because the technology it takes to find any living creatures on any star is extremely difficult by our current technology, let alone reach to it. Therefore, fund should be used for research on physics, and try to improve our space craft to overcome the problem of distance limitation on space travel.
On the other hand, there is a variety of crucial problems on the earth that challenging human survival. If the temperature of our planet would continue rising because of the greenhouse effect, some disasters would happen in an uncontrollable way. For example, some scientists said that the extreme weather phenomenon that happened all over the world was cause by the increasing of temperature. In addition, there are still a large group people living in poverty with not enough food and nutrition intake in the world. Moreover, the spreading of nuclear weapon can threaten the survival of humankind.
In conclusion, even though exploring unknown field is important for the advances in science, looking for space creatures is far too difficult now. There are many serious problems that need to be solved as mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an uncontrollable way" with adverb for "uncontrollable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...use effect, some disasters would happen in an uncontrollable way. For example, some scientists said that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22519083969 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75082825993 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610687022901 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4722203493 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.307692308 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163710628252 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574875610184 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531390100666 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988635302129 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313093099861 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.