Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent
do you agree or disagree?
It is true that some ex-offenders can become particularly useful citizens for society after being released from prison. While I agree that those individuals are good role models to prevent children from committing offences, I also believe that there are better alternatives to this issue. The justifications for this are as follows.
On the one hand, I think that children are more convinced of the advice from ex-prisoners who can speak from real experience they have undergone. In other words, reformed offenders can tell teenagers about their involvement in illicit activities and the hazards of leading a criminal lifestyle. As a result, those vivid stories could help to dispel any misconceptions of youngsters about many wrongdoers’ glamorous lives and act as a deterrent to effectively combat crime among young people.
On the other hand, it is also my personal belief that a combination of various education methods would produce much more desirable outcomes. To embark on, as home environment has such an extremely profound impact on the development of a child, parents are those who should be responsible for raising children’s awareness of different social maladies as well as teaching them how to avoid them. This way, a significant proportion of teenagers would be deterred from violating the laws as they grow up. Furthermore, crime education in school is not to be overlooked, and a healthy education environment should also be promoted nationwide, thereby contributing to crime tackle.
By way of conclusion, although I agree speech given by those who turn over a new leaf after serving a prison sentence can be helpful, I also support the view that many other measures should not be neglected.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, so, well, while, i think, as a result, as well as, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22463768116 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01604266176 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630434782609 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.4794314366 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.090909091 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8181818182 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116678244094 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425667875513 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029967589403 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729961354115 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285826999337 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.