Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later. Some people think that they are the best people to talk to school students about the danger of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Educating students away from crime is always a heated topic among the public. Some people argue that the person who has been released from prison and becoming a nice resident subsequently is the best person to educate students about the dangerous consequence of crime. Personally, I partially disagree with this statement because there are more alternative options that people can take.
On the one hand, the ex-criminal who has been a nice citizen could teach students more knowledge about the consequence of breaking the law. To begin with, they have experienced prison life once and they understand the risk of committing a crime. For instance, they could share with students about the experience of threat or the feeling of different facts they have suffered in jail. This will help these youths to have a good understanding of the consequence if they commit a crime.
On the other hand, there is some better person who can take responsibility to educate students about criminal education. The experts who have a solid grasp of specific knowledge about crime prevention are considered as an ideal person to deal with students. Students will acquire much knowledge related to the crime from the minor offenders to the serious criminals, from the initial motivation to the final judgement, from the changing of their later lives to the trauma to the victims. These young people will learn more they can image and it can help them to avoid themselves become criminals.
In conclusion, although a reformed ex-prisoner may help students away from crime, experts can do more. From my point of view, I agree that an encouraging speech from ex-prisoner may be useful to students but not the best.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08896797153 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68244793159 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544483985765 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8587184555 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337564000763 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119982788485 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672343309847 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201215460757 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671320047813 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.