The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
It is a heated top about how to preserve the natural ecosystem among the public. Some folks state that the increasing demand for consumer products is damaging the natural environment. This essay will discuss the reasons for this phenomenon and give some suggestion in the end.
To begin with, human activities are taking the main responsibility for environmental issues. The growing population is considered as one of the most important facts that impact the natural damage. Because to meet the demand of increasing population needs, deforestation and fact farming are taking action necessarily. As a result, the biodiversity will suffer from these actions because of the loss of their habitat. Furthermore, air pollution and Ozone layer depletion have been pinned down to one major human activity. In addition, car exhaust and factory emissions are the main contributors to global warming which lead to the melting glaciers.
On the other hand, in spite people are facing serious environmental issues currently, it is still not too late if take action now. Firstly, the government should take action to enhance the awareness of environmental issues among the public. For example, to run a more efficient transport system and encourage people to use public transport more in order to reduce the fuel emission. Secondly, in term of individuals, not to use plastic shopping bags and disposable items such as disposable chopsticks, even not to buy a car, these are all achievable.
In conclusion, this essay argued the main causes and suggest some solutions related to it. Although it seems difficult to sustain economic growth without damaging the environment, some man-made damage is still preventable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37037037037 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91349680776 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.4869344781 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168407420056 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538671742294 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638660504564 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110868715555 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081758919055 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.