The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
It is thought that the risr in the production of client good results in damage to the natural environment. This essay will elaborate on various reasons emanating from this matter and analyse serveral solutions to minimize these ramifications.
There are numerous possible causes for this dangerous issue. First and formost, in the industrialized world and with the appearance of modern technology such as automatic robots, the increase in the number of industries and companies is the most crucial reason for this troubles. Not only does the high-quality production require a profusion of fuel such as oil and expensive innovation, but also a plenty of harmful influence will be led by non-renewable fuel like air-polution, climate change or gobal warning. Furthermore, many managers of large business consider that the quantity of production is the best method in order to demonstrate the power with their competitor companies. A variety of contaminates waste from their unnecessary production can be discharged to the river and thand land, which lead to some dangerous disaters such as soil-polution and water-polution.
Nevertheless, there exist a multitude of remedies for this type of issue. To start with, the government of their country can put higher taxes and rigid punishment for negative productions of the industry in order to reduce the propotion of insignificant equipment and non-renewable fuel. Morover, each senior of business need to have their personal's awareness about the impaction of their action to the natural atmosphere; therefore, they can alter their poisonous process or dangerous systerm.
To conclude, there are two main reasons why the environment severely impacted by the increase in the production of consumer goods. To address this problem, extra taxer should be appeared more frequenly and each person must have conscious self-awareness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions to minimize these ramifications. There are numerous possible causes for t...
^^
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and companies is the most crucial reason for this troubles. Not only does the hig...
^^
Line 2, column 269, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...mpanies is the most crucial reason for this troubles. Not only does the high-qualit...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as soil-polution and water-polution. Nevertheless, there exist a multitude of...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isonous process or dangerous systerm. To conclude, there are two main reasons ...
^^
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the environment severely impacted by the increase in the production of consumer g...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49134948097 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13038463427 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615916955017 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1471281545 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258134144525 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934509896075 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546271618489 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160686275279 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549731026852 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.