in some places old age is valued while in other cultures youth is considered more important discuss both views and give your opinion
The graph below show the conception of three spreads from 1981 to 2007.
It is believed by few individuals that old person is more valued in some places whereas some believe that youth is more pivotal. I will discuss the both views alongwith my perspective.
To commence with, there are several reason why old age is valued in some spots? First and foremost; old people have of knowledge as well as experience as compared to youngsters. In other words, for the growth of multinational companies and businesses where also requires high experience person who know the techniques and tricks for the business very well. Apart from that, old person also help to the families because they provide advices which also help to handle the difficulties. For instance, the prime minister of India is 65+ with this he was a vast information knowledge and experience related to his field.
On the other side, few considered youth is play important role. Today's youth is very sharper and creator because they are a nation builder of tomorrow. To precise more, nowadays technology spreads corner of the world due to everyone become more intelligent and aware about the computer technology. In this situation, new companies also higher more educators who properly know about electronic gadgets and machines. So youngster have immensely creative or sharper mind. They handle the electronics gadgets very clearly and comfortably. To epitome, in foreign countries, more and more youth aware about the advanced technological machines such as laptop computers and delivery machines. As a result, youngster are more energetic than older people in physical field.
To recapitulate, although if youngster have a sharp mind, grace, creativity and sharpness. Yet, older people also have their own importance and significance. Consequently, both have their own values and respect.
The provided line graph illustrates, the number of consumption of 3 spreads between 1981 to 2001.
After analyzing, it can be clearly seen that in 1996, the consumption of low fat and reduced spreads almost at 6 grams. After that, it's significant increase approximately by 82 grams in 2001. Moreover, it drop out and reached at around 67 grams in 2007.
By contrast, in 1981, the use of butter spreads and margarine almost 86 and 14 grams respectively. consumption of butter spreads increase by 8 grams and margarine separate the crease by 8 grams in 1986. However, from 1991 to 2007, use of butter spreads drop out continuously and reached almost 46 grams in 2007. But margarines separates was identical in 1991 and 1996. From 2001 to 2007, it again declined by 40 grams.
Looking from an overall perspective, the conception of butter separates highest compared to low fat and margarines in given time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is believed by few individuals that old ...
^^
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed by few individuals that old person is more valued in some places whereas some ...
^^
Line 8, column 205, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'drops'?
Suggestion: drops
...ately by 82 grams in 2001. Moreover, it drop out and reached at around 67 grams in 2...
^^^^
Line 9, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consumption
...ne almost 86 and 14 grams respectively. consumption of butter spreads increase by 8 grams a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f butter spreads increase by 8 grams and margarine separate the crease by 8 grams...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, whereas, apart from, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2261.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 437.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17391304348 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84569762317 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546910755149 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.76152304609 315% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 16.0721442886 174% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8701564803 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.75 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6071428571 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 8.67935871743 219% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246279451114 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570404371934 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539413308643 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09984645802 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661016037988 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.