The tables below show the consumption and production of potatoes in different regions of the world in 2006.
The given tabular charts illustrate, the information about consumption and production of potatoes in a different region such a south and Central America, Africa, North America, Europe and Asia, given time period in 2006.
the units of production of potatoes given into million tons and consumption of potatoes calibrated into kg.
In south and Central America, the consumption of potatoes were around 20 kg which were more as compared to production of potatoes in same reason. It was 15 million tonnes. In Africa, around 10 kg consumption of potatoes but yield of potatoes were 20 million tonnes in Africa.
In North America, consumption and production of potatoes were around 60 kg and 20 million tonnes respectively in given time period. And production of potatoes were less as compared to consumption of potatoes. the consumption of potatoes in both regions Europe and Asia were 130 kg respectively. But yield of potatoes in Europe and Asia 130 kg and 130 million tonnes respectively. Production of potatoes were the same in both regions like, Europe and Asia.
Overall, it can be seen that the conception of potatoes were highest in Europe rather than others reason, because the people of Europe's were very found of potatoes whereas Asia was the highest reason of potatoes production as compared to other regions throughout the given time period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e and Asia, given time period in 2006. the units of production of potatoes given i...
^^^
Line 2, column 48, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ts of production of potatoes given into million tons and consumption of potatoes calibr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...atoes were around 20 kg which were more as compared to production of potatoes in s...
^^
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...d. And production of potatoes were less as compared to consumption of potatoes. th...
^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...as compared to consumption of potatoes. the consumption of potatoes in both regions...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14027149321 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80352438573 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.384615384615 0.547539520022 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.008263975 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.272727273 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.81818181818 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278871541416 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147406102625 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066941675697 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188295748439 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371659966088 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.