even though globalisation affect the words economics in a very positive way it's a negative side should not be forgotten discuss the both views and give your opinion.
The world's economics are affected by globalisation which is a positive affect however it has a negative affect which should not be avoided. This essay will articulate the both views along with my perspective.
To commence with, there are several positive sides of the globalisation. the predominant one is that it increase the growth of economics as well as create job opportunities for uneducated and well educated people's. To be more precise, show the globalisation many technological gadgets, devices as well as machines develop which make the person's life easier and convenient. Secondly, it provide chances to people for jobs vacancies. To epitome, many multinational companies when make a new product then these companies require a lot of people for work on the product. In this case, many people people get a job as well as a least products also help in a financial growth. As a result, more and more people can easily leave their lives with the latest technology as well as gadgets.
Why the negative sides should not forgotten? There are some reason behind this situation. Firstly, when the advancement of technological gadgets such as mobile phones, televisions radios and so on. Through these gadgets people become introvert as well as aggressive. Due to the fact that they change their behaviour. For example, when some programs telecast by satellites. They follow their favourite actor artist and actresses exctera and they do same which they see on the televisions and mobile phones. Thus, they fact their behaviour and thinking when they follow their favourite personalities.
To recapitulate, although globalisation has a negative sides. Yet I believe that the positive side more beneficial for world,s economics as well as employment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
The worlds economics are affected by globalisation...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...al positive sides of the globalisation. the predominant one is that it increase the...
^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...well as machines develop which make the persons life easier and convenient. Secondly, i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...ife easier and convenient. Secondly, it provide chances to people for jobs vacancies. T...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: people
...work on the product. In this case, many people people get a job as well as a least products a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...many people people get a job as well as a least products also help in a financial...
^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , s
... positive side more beneficial for world,s economics as well as employment.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26690391459 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96532477973 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55871886121 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7895510835 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8947368421 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7894736842 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155634839209 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05601267749 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885123828364 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135566241985 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102188544653 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.