Science has been a prevalent subject over recent years due to the advent of advanced technology. However, some rich countries see a decline in the number of children who study science subjects during their secondary education. In the following essays, the consequence of this scenario and other opinions about this situation would be elaborated.
The decrease in the number of children who engage in science subjects would lead to serious implications on the children. This is due to the fact that science is a dominant industry in the modern society, which represents that people who take part in science-related work would be provided with great treatment and prospect. If children are unwilling to study the subject with respect to the science, they would probably lose great opportunities of having a successful and satisfying career. To demonstrate, people who study science subjects often have access to renowned corporations, and live a content life with abundant salary.
In addition, the diminishing of the number of children taking science subject would bring about repercussion to their countries as well. The improvement of the technology which provides considerable advantages for human lives is attributed to the theory of science. If there is scarce people in the future job market, the development of technology would stagnate or even curtail. In this case, people may not experience convenience satisfaction of life.
To remedy this unpalatable circumstance, it is imperative that children should be motivated to study science. A measure can be done that the educators have responsibility to impart the importance of science to the children at school. For instance, teachers should be commissioned to convey the modern technology is originated from the science.
By way of conclusion, as argued above, I firmly believe that children should be encouraged to engage in science subjects because science could bring forward the technology which could lead more content life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, so, well, for instance, in addition, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.3376753507 324% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43729903537 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00547640333 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530546623794 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9827894193 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.733333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420339079901 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147176932118 0.084324248473 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114478329607 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235375514318 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612773714725 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.