The given bar graph denotes the proportion of four different means of transportation utilized by people for travel to and from work in a city of Europe in three separate years, namely 1960, 1980, and 2000.
On the whole, as can be seen from the graph, there is a rise in the utilization of car from 1960 to 2000, whereas the bus observed a drop in the percentage of commuters between the given years. Moreover, transport of train and tube underwent fluctuation throughout the period from 1960 to 2000.
Turning to detail, in terms of 1960, the most popularly used transportation is the bus, accounting for roughly 38%. On the contrary, the car witnessed the least statistics in 1960, making up merely 7%. By the same token, the most predominant number fell into the category of car in 2000, comprising nearly 36%. Conversely, the bus saw the least proportion of travellers in the year 2000, taking up 15%.
The most striking point is that the most dramatic gap lied in the transport of car, rising by 30% from between 1960 and 2000. Meanwhile, the tube witnessed the narrowest difference in the proportion, diminishing from 26% in 1960 to 22% in 1980, and rising to 25% by the year 2000.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, moreover, whereas, while, on the contrary, on the whole, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73684210526 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70054052333 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535885167464 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2929910652 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350678576264 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143167648824 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889189660187 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228401615366 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779428061851 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.