The given line graph portrays the expenditure spending on books in Germany, France, Italy, and Austria from 1995 to 2005.
On the whole, most of the countries experienced fluctuation in the spending on the books between 1995 and 2005, except France. Germany has the largest number in expenditure on books throughout the ten-year period. On the contrary, Austria saw the least number in spending on books initially, but became the third place in the year 2005.
Turning to the detail, it is salient that the predominant number of expenditure on books could be observed in Germany. Besides, there was an upward trend in the spending, rising from 80 million in 1995 to a pinnacle of 95 million US dollars in 2005. By the same token, the second most number spending on books fell into France, increasing from about 55 million initially to roughly 75 million US dollars finally. It is also interesting to note that the most dramatic change went to Austria. After rising from 30 to 40 million between 1995 and 1999, the number then remained constant in the following two years. Subsequently, this figure continued to grow sharply, and reach a peak of over 70 million in 2005, which is about twofold as in the year 1995.
The most striking point is that the number of expenditure on books in Austria intersected with that of Italy, standing at nearly 60 million in 2003.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'number' (without 'most') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: number
... in 2005. By the same token, the second most number spending on books fell into France, inc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 561, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...llion between 1995 and 1999, the number then remained constant in the following two ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, second, so, then, third, on the contrary, on the whole, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85106382979 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5705227374 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527659574468 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.4679313458 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.636363636 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255187813121 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111808590842 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882036429017 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192512625765 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975597038194 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.