History plays an important role in domestic cultures as people enact the regulation to maintain the old buildings. While some people advocate that the old buildings should be demolished and replaced by new ones, I believe that it is essential to preserve such historical structures. In the following essay will shed light on my opinion of the statement.
It is pivotal for the country to maintain the historical buildings due to the fact that it is beneficial to the development of tourism. In terms of the aspect of society, obsolete buildings represent the spirit and belief of local people, which are appealing for people around the world. One compelling example of this can be seen in Europe, the classical church and majestic cathedral are one of the most frequently visited sites in the European countries. As a result, old buildings are indispensable resources for facilitating the tourism.
On the other hand, I opine that history warrants preservation while progressing. The old buildings bring financial advantage for the country on account of its distinct features. A case in point is that there is a variety of traditional buildings such as temples and old housings remain in the town in Taiwan while developing the city. On one hand, it appeals tourists overseas for sight-seeing and boosts the economic development. On the other hand, it serves as a tradition and childhood memories for local people.
By way of conclusion, as argued above, I am convinced that it is imperative for any countries to maintain their old buildings by virtue of its treasured value.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, as for, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10384615385 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93542684617 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6715788614 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.076923077 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346696665443 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114389026173 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803228724729 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207057759657 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038391661785 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.