The given map illustrates the present of the centre of a town called Islip and its projected development.
On the whole, as can be seen form the map, there will be considerable changes between the present and the future. Some new housing and the new road is forecasted to be established. Moreover, more facilities including the shopping centre and bus station would be constructed in the town centre during the future development.
Turning to detail, in the present, the main road, located between two rows of shops, runs through the town centre. In the north of the centre lies the countryside of the town. The housing group is built in the middle of the town centre and the south of the centre area. Furthermore, a park and a school are situated in the east and south-east of the town centre, respectively.
In terms of projected modification, the countryside will disappear in the future. The most striking point is that the entire city centre would be encircled by dual carriageway. The rows of shops lying in the north of the town centre would be demolished, and several new services such as bus station, shopping centre, and parking lot, would be established. Furthermore, the main road running through the centre area would be transformed to a pedestrian area. New housing will be founded beside the garden area which will be smaller than now.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, such as, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8961038961 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7710226891 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484848484848 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0086772461 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7692307692 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151288424622 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693886569825 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741810416682 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13856635911 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916059679526 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.