The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The given line graph compares the amount of commodities being transported by four different means from 1974 to 2002 in UK.

On the whole, as can be seen from the graph, there was an upward trend in road, water, and pipeline over the period of the given years. In contrast, the tendency of pipeline remained nearly unchanged, although it experienced fluctuation among the given period.

Turning to detail, it is salient that the most popular transportation is the road, transporting the largest number throughout the given period, from 70 to nearly 100 million tonnes of goods. On the contrary, the pipeline witnessed the least number of transportation, from about 5 million tonnes in 1974 to merely over 20 million tonnes of goods in 2002.

Last but not least, the most striking point is that the transportation of water intersected with that of rail in 1978, standing at 40 million tonnes. It is also interesting to note that the water transportation rose to the second most utilized transportation in the end of the given years, although it observed the second least quantities in goods transport in 1974.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, in contrast, on the contrary, on the whole

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01612903226 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8945160072 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6384023218 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.285714286 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200087794874 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995224547942 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882378314987 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137430104098 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890105891618 0.0819641961636 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.