Universities are composed of various kinds of students with distinctive abilities, personalities, interest and so on. While some people suggest that institutions should remain the equity of numbers in terms of gender. From my perspective, I firmly disagree with it due to the following reasons.
First and foremost, it is unfair and disadvantageous to all the students. As far as interest is concerned, the tendency of choosing the field between the school pupils varies considerably from person to person. For instance, female students are inclined to enroll the fields of management and nursing, whereas males are more likely to apply for engineering and science. Maintaining the identical numbers of students in two genders would not only restrain their freedom of choosing personal profession which attracts them most, but discourages their motivation of studying.
Despite the fact that some people believe that it is impartial for every student when carrying out the group works. To demonstrate, classifying the students into groups has been a ubiquitous measure for most of the universities. In the meantime, each group is distributed shared number of male and female students. In my opinion, having more males and females is not always beneficial for their group. A successful collaboration depends on their commitment to the team and the collective effort of all the teammates. As a result, I opine that it is unnecessary to control the number of students in genders for such a reason.
In conclusion, as argued above, I utterly opposed to the proposal that every subjects in the universities should have same percentage of pupil’s number in terms of gender.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ies, personalities, interest and so on. While some people suggest that institutions s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33082706767 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04565111736 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582706766917 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6341537979 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.285714286 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21563810499 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683432717811 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496001391855 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130108255109 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343993908577 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.