The tradition not only plays an essential part of the society, but also represents the local features of a country or city. However, some people believe that those attributes of tradition such as conventional technique and living styles will no longer survive since the arrival of technology. In my view, I completely disagree with the prompt that I opine the traditional features will still be alive.
Although the soaring advancement of technology tremendously influenced people’s daily life in terms of various aspects, the traditional technique remains important to local people and the country. It is apparent that visitors around the global still were appealed by the local culture and tradition. One salient example can be seen in MeiNong, an old town situated in the east of Kaohsiung which renowned for its hand-made paper umbrella. According to the statistics, it attracted thousands of tourists to patronize the plants which produce the manual crafts. As a result, the local tradition even serves as an indispensable role in the country.
Admittedly, with the significant impact exerted by the significant improvement of modern technology, the local traditions are compelled to disappear. Nevertheless, several measures are feasible to remedy this situation. Take Taiwan for example, the conservative areas are well established throughout entire nation, which preserved the valuable aboriginal culture. Visitors who sight-seeing in Taiwan are given the opportunity to appreciate the magnificent tradition of the living style of the indigenous people.
By way of conclusion, despite the fact that modern technology utterly makes human life more convenient, I am firmly convinced that the tradition will thrive by virtue of the benefit it brings.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, well, for example, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5873605948 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05276673715 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631970260223 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3572232664 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.615384615 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125243277163 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382925640627 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303438525895 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0740294041416 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018380922561 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.