Health has been an indispensable standard since past decades. Some people believe that the optimal way to raise the people’s health standard is to increase the sports facilities. However, others consider that it would remain little effect, and must be replaced by other means. From my perspective, I opine that rising up the number of sports facilities is an ideal option to improve public health.
It is widely acknowledged that exercising exerts considerable positive effects on human health. First and foremost, by regular exercise, people could enhance their immune system. This is often due to the fact that the process of exercising would facilitate the circulation of human body and, therefore, accelerate the elimination of the waste inside human body.
In addition to strengthening human immune system, exercise acts as a contributor to make people happy because it is effective in relieving human stress. The physical effectiveness such as improving the muscle power and sweating generate positive energy for human. In this case, people often feel less stressed and become happier after exercising. As a result, people could truly benefit from the exercise.
On the other hand, some people believe that establishing sport facilities is of little effect on public health. This is often attributed to the fact that certain people who swamped with work have less amount of time to go exercising. A compelling example can be seen in Taiwan, most people work for over eight hours per day. After working, people are reluctant and tired of engaging in physical activities. Hence, it is imperative that government should modify the duration of working. Otherwise, people are expected to become less fit and unhealthy.
By way of conclusion, as argued above, despite the fact that some people think there is little effect on human health to increase the sport facilities, I utterly agree that it is an optimal proposition as far as health is concerned.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, in addition, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26349206349 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77379306033 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565079365079 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1536516916 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1111111111 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313028383086 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951254072397 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925905791724 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18355302897 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990587577303 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.