Human society has witnessed a tremendous transformation since decades ago. However, nowadays people lives in a “throw away” society, this suggests the life span of things or items which people utilize become shorter than before. In the following essays, I would explicit the possible reasons for this problem and the consequence it brings about.
First and foremost, the ideology of the consumerism is the culprit of the issue. People constantly purchase the goods in order to satisfy their own desire of materialistic possession. Therefore, the old items or commodities which people buy are replaced and discarded. The ever-changing cell phones is a compelling example for the issue─People are inclined to buy for new cell phones when the latest design is introduced. The duration of use of the cell phone become shorter than before, curtailing from 18 months to 1 year, compared to previous year. As a result, people have a tendency to dispose of still useful items more frequently.
This “throw away” culture often inflicts grave ramifications in the future. On one hand, it would aggravate the environmental degradation. Since more and more items and goods are discarded, our environment is filled with ever-increasing amount of rubbish which people struggle to dispose of. Accordingly, environmental problem such as pollution inevitably arise. Take China for example, the amount of waste which China creates has exceeded the average amount of waste created by Europe. On the other hand, the depletion of natural resources is another serious consequence. For instance, in order to satisfy more generation and population, the natural resources such as wood and metal are massively exploited.
By way of conclusion, as argued above, it is imperative that every individual should reflect on the issue which we are encountering. Though it is virtually impossible to eradicate the consumerism, there are still viable solutions to at least mitigate the repercussion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... ago. However, nowadays people lives in a 'throw away' society, this su...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, at least, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48701298701 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10003563655 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1921563423 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8888888889 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27777777778 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228158583015 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588440069608 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101142300401 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128274654928 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899604567651 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.