Every year several languages die out every year. Some people think that it is not important because life will be easier when there are fewer languages. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Language has been one of an indispensable fraction of human life since the hundred decades ago. People satisfied various needs by taking advantage of the language such as communication and education. However, it is often argued that it will be much simple for human life if certain languages disappear. In my view, I partially agree with the prompt, and my opinion would be shed light on as follows.

It is widely acknowledged that languages are vitally important to human beings. If the language is absence to any race or nations, people are incapable of making connections and communicating with each other. To demonstrate, prior to the invention of the language and words, people are unable to communicate with others and engage in important activities such as education. Ever since the language has been developed, it enables people to communicate and impart the informative information to every people. As a result, language is indispensable component of human life.

However, a variety of languages may inflict adverse effect on the society. Redundancy of languages would probably alienate people from others, and make human life even more challenging because languages vary considerably from country to country. A compelling example of this can be seen in the international traveling, tourists from around the world are incompetent to communicate with the indigenous people owing to the significant disparities of their language. In this case, people often feel depressed and helpless when people cannot understand each other. Hence, it might be much easier for human on condition that there is only few languages in the world.

By way of conclusion, as argued above, I reiterate my opinion that the languages could be either beneficial or disadvantageous to the entire community.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, so, such as, as a result, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33450704225 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03494778439 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552816901408 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6530031691 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239555058957 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082006530149 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.020733414431 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141045174891 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391389511131 0.056905535591 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.