The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given map illustrates the hospital and its surroundings. The top one and the below one compares the transformation of the structure surrounding the city hospital. On the whole, there is a considerable change in the road accessing to the city hospital in 2010, compared to 2007.

In 2007, the city hospital was surrounded by the ring road. The city road was structured in the lower part of the map, intersecting with the hospital road which connected to the hospital. Several bus stops was placed beside the hospital road. Car park for the staff and public is located on the corner of hospital and city road.

However, there was a tremendous change in 2010. First, there were two roundabouts constructed on the ring road and city road. This two roundabouts not only connected the either side of the hospital road, but also attached to the bus station. Secondly, the car park for the staff is located in the similar place with comparison to 2007. The striking point is that a new public car park was established next to the city hospital.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Car) must be used with a third-person verb: 'parks'.
Suggestion: parks
...as placed beside the hospital road. Car park for the staff and public is located on ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, secondly, so, on the whole

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78453038674 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7135790927 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475138121547 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4475222544 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.1666666667 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0833333333 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288876531566 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122792180463 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680071580808 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21609838799 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254024729146 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.85 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.