Every individual comes from different background of family, be it middle-class, underprivileged family, affluent and or so. It is often argued that the children nurtured by the family who has insufficient money could handle the problems better than children from wealthy family when they grow up. In my view, I partially agree with that and I believe children from wealthy family could be well- prepared with the problems as well.
It is reasonable that children who grow up in family with financial problem would be better prepared with the problems of adulthood. This stems from the fact that children are more aware of the importance of money since they have experienced the toughness of financial shortage. A vivid example for this is that a majority of children who comes from a family afflicted by economic burden lead a better life when they grow up. Most of them are capable of control their expenditure and tackling the problems of finance.
On the other hand, people deem that children from affluent family are unlikely to prepare for the problem when they are in adulthood. This due to the fact that these children experience a stable life in their childhood rather than living in a harsh condition. Therefore, they might take it for granted that money is endless, which they can be extravagant to spend their money regardless of any situation. However, some children would have a well prepare for their adulthood problems if their parents impart them and cultivate them decent concept for money. As a result, rich family could posibly see the well-prepared for the problem in their children.
All in all, as argued above, I partly consent that children from the family with financial issue could have a better handle in the problem when they grow up. However, children from wealthy family could also prepare well if their parents educate them with proper concept.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, well, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00318471338 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56793967432 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455414012739 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.8245555393 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.214285714 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375666923929 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161158636981 0.084324248473 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120111537619 0.0667982634062 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27470852168 0.151304729494 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703845956111 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.