Some teachers say that students should be organized into groups to study while others argue that students should be made to study alone. Tell the benefits of each study method. Which one do you think is more effective?
It is well acknowledged that students are the future of any nation. Presently, some teachers claim that group study approach is a lucrative way to make students successful learners. By contrast, others assert that studying alone would bring more fruitful results. Here, I would like to account for both the views with my own perception.
There are manifold points to shore up the former approach. Initially, studying in batches provide pupils with the opportunity to share their ideas with other members. To illustrate, children tend to brainstorm their views and thoughts while doing their assignments and projects together and thus come out with more of creative solutions to problems. Consequently, they can broaden the horizon of their knowledge and learn in much lesser time. Moreover, pupils can develop negotiation skills such as making a point, agreeing or disagreeing with others and asking questions where necessary.
On the flip side, various points can be mentioned to support the latter view. To begin with, students will have no distractions when they study on their own. To elaborate, they would not be able to indulge in unnecessary talking and can fully concentrate on their study in a much better way. This is especially helpful in subjects like math and science. As a result, this method will fetch the students more fruitful results in their academics. Furthermore, it also enhances confidence in students and ability to solve one’s own problems. Apart from it, juveniles may become more competitive which is a mandatory trait required in today’s cut throat era of competition.
From my notion, both the approaches have their own importance. However, I still believe that teachers should encourage students to mix and match both the methods to avail lucrative outcomes. Boring subjects such as history and philosophy should be studied together in groups whereas subjects requiring concentration should be studied on individual basis.
To recapitulate, it can be stated that we cannot fix a particular method for studying in all situations. Teachers can use their judgments to decide whether to organize the students in a group or to make them study individually.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, well, whereas, while, apart from, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32378223496 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85922846164 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593123209169 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0586395751 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4761904762 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.619047619 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324516452516 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880436391091 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780721541419 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196297533954 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724288105061 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.