Some young people are leaving the countryside to live in cities and towns, leaving old people in the countryside. What problems are caused by this issue? What can be done to solve the situation?
Never before has there been a significant rise in the movement of the young from outside towns leaving elderly alone to the metropolitan. As a result, it has particular after-effects to the community customs. this essay will first suggest that the biggest problem caused by this phenomenon is the communication gap that is primary cause for extinction of the culture and tradition then provide economic help to develop new opportunities in local area as the most viable solution.
Just having a look at overall development of a countryside shows cardinal factors which have triggered the issue, mostly, search for job opportunities and higher education due to lack of chances to have a source of handsome income in residential area. For instance, according to a survey conducted in japan, there were 40% more flow of young citizens from other country parts to Tokyo, as compared to the data received previous year. this trend of the young inevitably results losing contact with the elderly and afterwards the loss of culture and tradition heritage. Because of this, it is easy to see why leaving elderly alone requires attention.
Nevertheless, there are possible ways to improve the scenario and one of them would be to support to economic diversification of rural areas. it is not mystery that rural economy holds significant potential for creating decent and productive jobs as well as contributing communication between the elderly and the young to reconstruct the heritage once was lost somewhat. Concrete example in this situation would be a recent contract signed by Japanese government to generate impressive employment opportunities to people who live the suburbs.
As a conclusion, stemming the rising tides caused by increasing young people’s wish to move urban areas is one of the foremost challenges we face; it will ultimately lead to lose of culture passes through communication from elderly to youth, but a possible solution could be utilized lost heritage prevention already suggested by japan governors. Recommendation for this situation would be that more countries should take such measures to avoid catastrophe.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Never' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
Never before has there been a significant ris...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...after-effects to the community customs. this essay will first suggest that the bigge...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... area as the most viable solution. Just having a look at overall developmen...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 435, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...red to the data received previous year. this trend of the young inevitably results l...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... elderly alone requires attention. Nevertheless, there are possible ways to...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...conomic diversification of rural areas. it is not mystery that rural economy holds...
^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es to people who live the suburbs. As a conclusion, stemming the rising tid...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, well, for instance, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40412979351 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03125729854 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610619469027 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.2251605725 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.666666667 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175002555176 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595953865844 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423640847999 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103148572451 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159422246055 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.