Space travel has been possible for some time and some people say that space tourism will be developed in the future. What do you think space travel is positive or negative a development?
Due to the development of technology and science, it would be feasible for people to travel to the universe in the years to come. Although there are some benefits of space travel, I would argue that there are far more drawbacks.
The main advantage of the trend toward space tourism is that it provides excitement and adventure to people. Customers may have chance to unravel the complex mysteries of the cosmos. By exploring the space, people can broaden their knowledge and experience with regard to the universe. Furthermore, space travel could greatly contribute to the advancement of space science. With the increased interest and high participation rate, a great deal of money and a wide range of resources could be invested in space tourism.
Despite the positives mentioned above, I believe that space travel contains various downsides. Firstly, a huge number of launching for space tourism can cause environmental pollution. Space shuttles release great quantities of exhaust fumes into the surroundings, and the ozone layer could be seriously damaged, accelerating global warming. Secondly, this type of travel will costs an enormous amount of money, which might be better spent on other purposes. For example, such a big sum of money can be used for people who suffer from war, poverty, famine and disease. Finally, space travel is likely to be very dangerous. Boarding a space craft and travelling through the universe tend to include a variety of potential risks, such as unexpected accidents and emergency situations.
In conclusion, while I recognize the possible advantages of space tourism, I consider it to be a negative development overall.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'cost'
Suggestion: cost
...ing. Secondly, this type of travel will costs an enormous amount of money, which migh...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27443609023 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84235637591 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62030075188 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7769969864 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.5333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458633931489 0.244688304435 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149913205341 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749661295793 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281401255445 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247277852903 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.