In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Despite of agricultural revolution, the significant part of population worldwide is still suffering from malnutrition and inability to find resources for repast. In conjunction, we have plethora of reasons that contribute to this result, and several factors will be considered in this essay. Also, it is apparent that there are many ways to prevent and reverse this problem.
Multitude of farms nowadays are equipped with high-technical machines and technologies to increase the amount of harvest and its quality. Nevertheless, the majority of developing countries have still had severe poverty regions. In conditions of dangerously low level of living people in those towns could not afford them to buy nutritious food just in case of unemployment. They have to eat what they grow by themselves or purchase second class food with low nutrition value. Moreover, the wars that are still going on in some places in our world, force resident of epicenter-countries to move away and leave their households. For instance, during the war in Karabakh of Armenia with Azerbaijan many Armenians lost their hosts, providing them with sustenance, so significant part of them became homeless and starving.
Regarding possible solutions, probably the most immediate short-term solution would be to change the combat strategies of all modern conflicts and cease fire agreements. Secondly, the paramount issue from the global perspective is to solve the problem of poor education in some regions. But it requires self-consciousness of people that have to be taught in order to be able to earn a living and feed their families. A further long-term solution might be an opposition to unequal distribution of income. I reckon, that proportional taxation system as in USA and a few European countries, occurs the best solution for this issue. Thus, resident with low wages get more opportunities to provide themselves with decent food and living.
Overall, the main reasons for hunger are disparity of resource distribution, wars and national conflicts and unemployment due to the lack of education. The minimalization of combat actions, increase of educational level and government involvement in taxation changes might bring tangible results.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, thus, for instance, i reckon
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44797687861 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16891798002 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621387283237 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8201065445 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.882352941 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3529411765 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170837617309 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488956077974 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490634211227 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095827761765 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746867604158 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.